If we plan for a metagenomic functional analysis of a marine samples what are we supposed to do before doing Whole Genome sequencing? I wish to find the metabolic potential of the sample so do we actually need to do 16s RNA amplification?
If we plan for a metagenomic functional analysis of a marine samples what are we supposed to do before doing Whole Genome sequencing? I wish to find the metabolic potential of the sample so do we actually need to do 16s RNA amplification?
In my understanding, 16s-rDNA (if you were sequencing RNA instead (meta-transcriptome), you do not need to amplify the 16s either because >90% of your sample will consist of ribosomal RNA) amplification by PCR is for taxonomic composition analysis only. If you want an overview of the metabolic potential of the community as a whole, including unknown or unexpected genes, I would not recommend it, because you will get only 16s by design. If you want to see what genes, pathways, GO-terms, subsystems are part of the ecosystem, I would use unbiased sequences. I think this approach is called (whole) metagenome shotgun sequencing.
Some references are in this question.
A good and open introduction: http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1000667
You would optimally do both, sequence 16s amplicons and whole metagenome shotgun, both of which are covered in the ploscomp review.
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Thanks for the reply.. Can you suggest and reference papers to understand and distinguish the methods better?
Thanks for the reply.. Can you suggest any reference papers to understand and distinguish the methods better?