Question: Which one to choose Type-I, Type-II, or Type-III ANOVA?
1
gravatar for BIOAWY
3 months ago by
BIOAWY60
HUJI
BIOAWY60 wrote:

I want to check the interaction between my two factors (genotype*FuncBIN), but my output comes as Type II ANOVA with interaction. I don't understand what the difference is between TypeI and TypeIII? Since my background is not very mathematics, it's very difficult for me to understand this mathematical notation; Type I SS: SS(A) SS(B|A) SS (AB|A, B) Type II SS: SS(A|B) SS(B|A) SS (AB|A, B) Type III SS: SS (A|B, AB) SS (B|A, AB) SS (A*B|A, B)?

structure( list(genotype = structure(c(3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L), .Label = c("WT", "Mut2", "Mut1" ), class = "factor"), FuncBIN = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 3L), .Label = c("Mitochondria ", "Golgi", "ER"), class = "factor"), k = c(0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.4, 0.6, 0.9, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 0.4, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 0.6, 0.8, 0.5, 0.4, 0.6, 0.2, 0.3, 0.1)), .Names = c("genotype", "FuncBIN", "k"), class = "data.frame", row.names = c(NA, -27L) )


library(car)
library(lsmeans)
library(multcomp)
fit <- lm(k ~ genotype + FuncBIN + genotype*FuncBIN, df) 
plot(fit) shapiro.test(residuals(fit)) 
Anova(fit) 
lsmip(fit, FuncBIN ~ genotype) 
lsmeans(fit, pairwise ~ genotype)[[2]]
fit.tukey <- lsmeans(fit, pairwise ~ genotype | FuncBIN)[[2]]
fit.tukey
cld(fit.tukey)
R gene • 195 views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 9 weeks ago by pareek101surbhi0 • written 3 months ago by BIOAWY60
3

There's some detailed explanations on STackExchange: How to interpret type I, type II, and type III ANOVA and MANOVA?

ADD REPLYlink written 3 months ago by Kevin Blighe25k
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 633 users visited in the last hour