Question: Understanding significance of enrichR results
gravatar for kathryn.eckartt
23 months ago by
kathryn.eckartt30 wrote:

I have a set of differential expressed genes from RNAseq that I'm running basic enrichment analysis on using enrichR.

How is one meant to interpret the combined score value in the resulting data frame? Should this be used to determine significance instead of the adjusted P value?

I thought it might be so given Figure 2 in the original enrichR paper (Chen et al, 2013) but I haven't taken a statistics course yet despite being a first year in a biomedical PhD program. Thank you for all of your help

ADD COMMENTlink modified 5 months ago by Chiara.Caprioli0 • written 23 months ago by kathryn.eckartt30
gravatar for Charles Warden
23 months ago by
Charles Warden7.9k
Duarte, CA
Charles Warden7.9k wrote:

I haven't tested the Bioconductor version, but perhaps this message thread can be useful?

A: the best combine score for enrichment analysis from Enrichr

In terms of Enrichr interpretation, I usually check the first few categories ranked to show in the web-interface. However, I admittedly can't say for certain whether this is the "best" option. For IPA, sorting by either p-value or z-score can be helpful for different projects, so my guess is that use of the scores for Enrichr may be similar (meaning sometimes it is good to use the provided ranking, sometimes it is good to sort other ways).

ADD COMMENTlink modified 23 months ago • written 23 months ago by Charles Warden7.9k
Please log in to add an answer.


Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1859 users visited in the last hour