Question: Shannon vs Simpson for TCR diversity estimation
gravatar for CY
13 months ago by
United States
CY470 wrote:

My aim is to evaluate TCR status of cancer patient. Here is what I got after conducting some research:

Based on Shannon formula (α=1), Shannon index treats each TCR subclone proportionally as their relative fraction. Simpson (α=2) index however put more weights on dominate subclone.

I was prone to Shannon initially as I couldn't think of any reason not treating each subclone proportionally. However, now I think Simpson index may have its own consideration: 1: Very rare TCR sequences may be false positive due to technical error during TCR-Seq sequencing (difference between different TCR subclone may only be one nucleotide). 2: Dominate subclones may deserve more attention since they are most likely the one activated by neoantigen.

In addition for point above, TCR subclone with only one nucleotide difference may target same neoantigen. Therefore, they should not be treated seperately (I guess this is the concept of functional diversity).

Not sure if my opinion make sense. Can someone share some comments? Thanks in advance.

simpson tcr shannon • 458 views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 13 months ago • written 13 months ago by CY470

What are you trying to achieve when you say evaluate TCR status? If you're worried about technical errors, try technical replication. See what the error rates look like.

ADD REPLYlink written 13 months ago by karl.stamm3.6k
Please log in to add an answer.


Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1351 users visited in the last hour