Question: How to evaluate correlation for multiple measurements per point?
gravatar for max.rempel2
13 days ago by
max.rempel20 wrote:

I've got a question about statistics. I have an experiment in which X - is a length of DNA fragment and for each X, there are 4 measurements of Y. Suppose, it is not obvious that there is an increase of Y with X. What is the proper statistic to verify that this increase is not a fluke?

P.S. I have many experiments like that so the answer will be useful. I don't think a simple correlation will do since the measurements are not independent: there are 4 replicates for each X. Also averaging is not good since this way I would lose a lot of stat power.

sample data

statistics • 80 views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 17 hours ago • written 13 days ago by max.rempel20

I would think more along the regression route in order to check the rate of change of one group per unit change in another (<- the beta coefficient). You may try a LOESS or linear fit. Looking at your plot, the increase appears linear. The penultimate measurement looks 'all over the place', though. Note that there are no statisticians here (that I know) - for a better answer, try Cross Validated.

ADD REPLYlink written 12 days ago by Kevin Blighe42k

Thank you very much! Great help! I have similar feedback from a statistician, with similar sentiments.

ADD REPLYlink written 9 days ago by max.rempel20

Yo should be aware of position-related sequencing artifacts

ADD REPLYlink written 10 days ago by chen1.9k

Thank you very much!

ADD REPLYlink written 9 days ago by max.rempel20
gravatar for max.rempel2
17 hours ago by
max.rempel20 wrote:

Finally, I just used a simple correlation test and it seemed to work just fine.

ADD COMMENTlink written 17 hours ago by max.rempel20
Please log in to add an answer.


Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1328 users visited in the last hour