Question: Looking For An Easy To Use Tool To Analyse A Gene Set For Enrichment Of Immunological Function
0
gravatar for confusedious
7.2 years ago by
confusedious420
Australia
confusedious420 wrote:

Hello everyone,

I have a gene set of ~1600 gene symbols that I have retrieved from NCBI and would like to analyse for enrichment of immunological function/pathways.

I have tried using both DAVID and Panther, but the difficulty I am having is figuring out which of the gargantuan list of terms that is returned relate to immunological function (some are obvious i.e. explicitly to do with B-cell function, others are terms that I don't even know where to begin with).

Is there any way I can filter such an analysis so that it only looks for enrichment of a certain type (immunological in this case)?

And if so, is this something that can be done in DAVID or Panther? Or would another tool be more appropriate?

Apologies if the answer is something obvious (I am very new to this) - I have spent several days reading and aren't any closer to an answer.

function analysis kegg • 2.6k views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 3.6 years ago • written 7.2 years ago by confusedious420
2

different GO levels have different level of details. for example GO-biological process level 5 for some gene might say B-cell activation whereas level 3 annotation for the same gene might say immune response.

So if you want a broad classification go for GO level 2 or 3

ADD REPLYlink modified 7.2 years ago • written 7.2 years ago by Bharat Iyengar290

Oh, I see! Very helpful, thank you. I'll just have to figure out how to adjust which level I am viewing then. Yes, you are quite right, it is really on the broad strokes I am looking for, it is a fairly crude analysis.

ADD REPLYlink written 7.2 years ago by confusedious420
1
gravatar for confusedious
3.6 years ago by
confusedious420
Australia
confusedious420 wrote:

I ended up using GOrilla which worked quite well. Worth a look.

ADD COMMENTlink written 3.6 years ago by confusedious420
1
gravatar for Charles Warden
7.2 years ago by
Charles Warden7.8k
Duarte, CA
Charles Warden7.8k wrote:

Also, MSigDB has a set of immunologic signatures (c7), so you may want to try out GSEA:

http://www.broadinstitute.org/gsea/msigdb/index.jsp

ADD COMMENTlink written 7.2 years ago by Charles Warden7.8k

That looks very interesting indeed - nice to see it also has an R interface, so I won't have to use any unfamiliar programming languages. I'll take a look, thank you.

ADD REPLYlink written 7.2 years ago by confusedious420

On looking into this, it seems to want to compare array data to one of their gene sets - I can't seem to find any way to coerce it into comparing my gene set to one of theirs.

ADD REPLYlink written 7.2 years ago by confusedious420
1

If you are working with HUGO gene symbols, you don't have to specify a chip design. You just have to set "Collapse dataset to gene symbols" to 'false'.

However, if you don't actually have any gene expression data, then that is indeed a problem. GSEA is designed to work with intensity / expression values, so that it doesn't depend on any upstream differential expression analysis.

Actually, GSEA is designed of users without any programming experience. So, I would typically recommend using the GUI over the R interface (that is really for users who need to design a pipeline to handle 100s of different projects). Hopefully, this can be useful for future analysis.

ADD REPLYlink written 7.2 years ago by Charles Warden7.8k

Yes, this is the case. I don't have expression data. I have a list of genes that were selected based on population differentiation statistics. The hypothesis is that population A and B should be strongly differentiated at immune genes, A and C should be moderately differentiated, and B and C should be differentiated relatively little. So I have obtained a list of genes that differentiate in the manner predicted, and am now testing these lists for enrichment for immune system related terms. I am having two main troubles. 1) Finding a test for enrichment that is relatively concise (i.e. lumps immune function together in a convenient way) and 2) Finding a test that can compare multiple gene lists against one another.

ADD REPLYlink written 7.2 years ago by confusedious420
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 720 users visited in the last hour