Question: Topgo Vs Gostats
6
gravatar for enricoferrero
6.7 years ago by
enricoferrero790
United Kingdom
enricoferrero790 wrote:

Hello Biostar,

I'm performing some Gene Ontology enrichment analysis using R/Bioconductor and, as far as I understand, there are two packages that allow to do this: topGO and GOstats (I'm not interested in packages that compare multiple datasets in this scenario).

The main difference seems to be the statistics used: GOstats uses the hypergeometric distribution (basically the standard way to test for overrepresentation), while topGO allows the user to use a much wider and complete range of algorithms and statistical tests to check for enrichment.

With regards to graphic capabilities, topGO seems to be producing much better graphs than GOstats, but I have only looked at the packages' vignettes.

Has anybody here experience with both? Which one did you end up using? Why?

Also, on a related note, what would be the topGO algorithm/statistics test combination that emulates GOstats' hypergeometrical test? Would it be the classic/fisher combination (used as the most basic example in topGO's vignette)?

Thank you.

R bioconductor gene-ontology • 6.9k views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 5.3 years ago by nitsuaq80 • written 6.7 years ago by enricoferrero790
3
gravatar for nitsuaq
5.3 years ago by
nitsuaq80
United States
nitsuaq80 wrote:

To avoid the following situation:

I tried both GOstats and topGO briefly before switching to topGO for all of my GO enrichment analysis in R. Its been a while but from what I remember it seemed more versatile, i.e. one can employ various default algorithm/test combinations (along with the capability of customized tests).

It seems reasonable that the classic/fisher would emulate GOstats hypergeometric test, though I have not tested this personally.

I found this was a good resource for working with topGO.

ADD COMMENTlink modified 5 months ago by RamRS26k • written 5.3 years ago by nitsuaq80
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1875 users visited in the last hour