BLASTP - parameters for soft filtering and smith-waterman alignment
0
0
Entering edit mode
2.6 years ago

Hello,

I'm trying to recreate the BLASTP parameters -F "m S" -s F (representing soft-filtering and smith waterman final alignment) from the paper below. However, I'm using BLAST+ v 2.10.1 and it looks like all the parameters are different.

Can someone confirm that the above parameter settings are analogous to running BLAST+ with -soft_masking True -use_sw_tback? i.e. is -use_sw_tback the same as -s F and is -soft_masking True the same as -F "m S"? I'm suggesting -use_sw_tback as it's literally the only flag description I can see that mentions smith-waterman:

-use_sw_tback
   Compute locally optimal Smith-Waterman alignments?

Also, I'm not sure if I should be including -seg yes with the BLASTP options - is seg what provides the locations mentioned for soft_masking below?

*** Query filtering options
-seg <String>
  Filter query sequence with SEG (Format: 'yes', 'window locut hicut', or
  'no' to disable)
  Default = `no'
-soft_masking <Boolean>
  Apply filtering locations as soft masks
  Default = `false'

Lastly, in general, I'm not sure if query soft-masking, potentially including seg, requires the database to be masked as well. I assume they are completely separate?

Thanks for reading what has become a slight stream of consciousness, much appreciated :P

paper 1:
Gabriel Moreno-Hagelsieb, Kristen Latimer, Choosing BLAST options for better detection of orthologs as reciprocal best hits, Bioinformatics, Volume 24, Issue 3, 1 February 2008, Pages 319–324, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm585

seg soft-filtering blastp • 493 views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2439 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6