How To Make A Proper Use Of Blocking In Limma Using Voom.
1
3
Entering edit mode
8.1 years ago
catagui ▴ 40

Hi,

I have a RNAseq data to analyse were I have a control and a one treatment for different individuals. I need to block the effects of the individual, but I am having several troubles to get the data that I need. I am using voom because my data is very heterogeneous and voom seams to do a good job normalising my reads.

I am having the following issues:

  1. I want to get the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of my treatment not of my control. I don't understand after the eBayes analysis why I get the coefficients for both. I have tried a > makeContrasts (TreatvsCont= c2-co, levels = design) to subtract the control effect but then I get 0 DEGs.

  2. I am not sure when to include the 0 (null model) in the model formula, I have seen examples for both types of models.

This are my targets, with my column names of my counts, individual and condition

targets

Individual condition

A1 1 co

A2 3 co

A4 4 co

A5 5 co

E1 1 c2

E2 2 c2

E3 3 c2

E4 4 c2

E5 5 c2 `

This is the code I have been trying:

co2=as.matrix(read.table("2014_04_02_1h_PB.csv",header=T, sep=",", row.names=1))

nf = calcNormFactors (co2)

targets= read.table ("targets.csv", header = T, sep=",",row.names=1)

treat <- factor (targets$condition, levels= c("co", "c2"))

design <- model.matrix(~0+treat)

colnames (design) <- levels (treat)

y <- voom(co2,design,lib.size=colSums(co2)*nf)

corfit <- duplicateCorrelation(y,design,block=targets$Individual)

fit <- lmFit(y,design,block=targets$Individual,correlation=corfit$consensus)

fit2<- eBayes (fit)

results_trt <- topTable (fit2, coef="c2", n=nrow (y), sort.by="none")

From which gives me 18,000 genes with adj.P.Val < 0.01 out of 22,000 genes that I have in total. Which makes no sense..

Thanks in advance for the help.

limma rnaseq • 5.8k views
ADD COMMENT
2
Entering edit mode

With just two groups, you can just design <- model.matrix(~treat). Also, you might try getting rid of "individual 2", since that person isn't in both conditions.

Also, what sort of normalization factor distribution do you have? I've seen cases where including one sample with vastly fewer reads than the others has screwed up the analysis due to the normalization factors being off.

ADD REPLY
2
Entering edit mode
8.1 years ago
julien.roux ▴ 110

Hi,

I think you need to call the voom function twice, see this thread on the Bioconductor mailing list.

Hope this helps

Julien

ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode

Just to follow up on Julien's recommendation. I had found conflicting advice on whether to run voom a second time, so I asked on the Bioconductor mailing list (thread). The consensus was that running voom a second time can only help the analysis and at worst will not make a difference.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

I'd actually forgotten about that, thanks for the reminder!

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1482 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6