Question: ChIP-Seq alignment with random site for duplicated
0
gravatar for kuragari.ch
4.1 years ago by
kuragari.ch20
Spain
kuragari.ch20 wrote:

Dear all,

 

I want to align my ChIP-Seq samples but with two strategies:

  1. Align the fastq.gz files and remove the reads that match to more than one site
  2. Align the fastq.gz files and, for those reads that are duplicated that match more than one site, assign a random site for them.

Can someone tell me hoe to do this ?

As fas as I know, I can use bowtie2: For second situation (random assign multi-matching reads):

  • Use the -a argument for bowtie2 to look for all the "best" sites for a read and selects the binding randomly from the "best" sites.

But I don't know how to perform the first situation (delete multi-matching reads).

bowtie bwa chip-seq alignment • 1.2k views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 4.1 years ago by Fidel1.9k • written 4.1 years ago by kuragari.ch20
2
gravatar for Sander
4.1 years ago by
Sander20
The Netherlands
Sander20 wrote:

Hi, I can recommend Bowtie1 for this purpose. It has an option for exactly what you want:

-m <int>           suppress all alignments if > <int> exist (def: no limit)

So in your case, you want to set -m 1

I don't have experience with Bowtie2, (I've looked in the help but couldn’t find a similar option), maybe this options is hidden in a different parameter, or it is not possible.

 

For you 2nd strategy, in Bowtie1 you can use:

  -M <int>           like -m, but reports 1 random hit (MAPQ=0); requires --best

Again, for your purpose -M 1

ADD COMMENTlink written 4.1 years ago by Sander20
0
gravatar for Fidel
4.1 years ago by
Fidel1.9k
Germany
Fidel1.9k wrote:

For both cases you can use bowtie2 as it will map your reads using random mapping but you can filter them afterwards. Be sure to use an assembly that contains all unassigned regions (those _random). Otherwise some regions will appear unique when they are not.

To remove multi-reads, filter the mapping file file by mapping  quality. Multi-map reads usually have a low quality score of 1. This is as far as I understand the best way to remove multi-reads. 

I will discourage the use of bowtie1 if your reads are longer than 36bp. 

ADD COMMENTlink written 4.1 years ago by Fidel1.9k
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1110 users visited in the last hour