De novo assembly
0
0
Entering edit mode
8.0 years ago
Huynh Nguyen ▴ 10

Dear all,

Please let me know if I could use CLC Genomic Workbench 8.0 for De novo metagenomic assembly.

Thanks you all so much.

Assembly sequencing next-gen • 1.8k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Ask CLC, it's a commercial product, they'll answer your phone call.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

I will try, thank you so much.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

You will need a license for the microbial genomics module for CLC which requires a separate license. Check with CLC support.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

If you're looking for an alternative, a common assembler is Canu. Not sure what type of reads you have though.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Some information about my project: We aim to investigate diversity of microbial community in forest soil. In addition, we also focus on mining genes encoding laccase enzyme.

  • DNA: isolated from forest soil
  • Sequencer: Illumina Hiseq 2500

I sent my DNA samples to Baseclear company (in Netherlands). After that they gave me paired-end raw sequences and assembled sequence that was assembled using CLC Genomic Workench 8.0. I don't know that this Workbench was optimized for metagenomic de novo assembly. Is this method good enough for downstream bioinformatics analysis?

Thank you all for your help!

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

I am not sure you can use canu in this case.
You may want to try SPAdes or metavelvet. Both will require knowledge of unix/command line along with access to a proper server with enough RAM etc.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Right, illumina sequencing. You're right and Canu is not appropriate here. Just back from London Calling (Oxford Nanopore Conference) :-)

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks but what do you think about CLC Genomic workbench? Is it appropriate? I have already received assembled results from Baseclear and I am confusing about this results.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

I don't know if there is a difference between the CLC genome assembler (and the one provided by CLC microbial genomics module). You are going to have to contact Baseclear and ask them which one they used for the assembly. Then call/email CLC tech support and ask them about difference, in case Baseclear did not use the microbial one. If they say that there are no differences then you should be able to go ahead with whatever else you want to do with this assembly.

If you want to start from scratch with fastq reads, we have given you a couple of options above.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks so much for your suggestions.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2119 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6