Question: SomaticSniper VS Varscan2
1
gravatar for user230613
5 months ago by
user230613240
Europe
user230613240 wrote:

Hi guys,

As far as I've read, both SomaticSniper and Varscan variant calling algorithms have been developed by the same group. Do you have any experience of which one is more accurate? Or in which conditions should I use one or the other?

Thank you in advance,

ADD COMMENTlink modified 5 months ago by Chris Miller18k • written 5 months ago by user230613240
2
gravatar for Chris Miller
5 months ago by
Chris Miller18k
Washington University in St. Louis, MO
Chris Miller18k wrote:

It just depends on what you're doing. Somatic Sniper has largely been superceded by a new generation of callers (Mutect, Strelka, etc) but is still useful in the niche case of having tumor contamination in your normal sample (very few other callers are designed to handle this case). In general, VarScan has kept up with the times pretty well.

That said, relying on a single caller is probably not your best bet. Each has strengths and weaknesses, and an ensemble approach followed by intelligent merging is probably your best bet for maximizing your performance.

ADD COMMENTlink written 5 months ago by Chris Miller18k

Thank you very much! However I don't get you point about the advantages of using SomaticSniper when tumor contamination is expected in normal sample. As far as I can read in Varscan2 help, Varscan2 can handle this issue with the following two arguments:

--normal-purity - Estimated purity (non-tumor content) of normal sample [1.00]
--tumor-purity - Estimated purity (tumor content)

Am I missing something?

ADD REPLYlink written 5 months ago by user230613240
1
gravatar for TriS
5 months ago by
TriS2.9k
United States, Buffalo
TriS2.9k wrote:

there are a number of papers out there comparing them (with other variant callers). examples are:

Evaluation of Nine Somatic Variant Callers for Detection of Somatic Mutations in Exome and Targeted Deep Sequencing Data Detecting somatic point mutations in cancer genome sequencing data: a comparison of mutation callers A comparative analysis of algorithms for somatic SNV detection in cancer

ADD COMMENTlink written 5 months ago by TriS2.9k
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 466 users visited in the last hour