Question: SomaticSniper VS Varscan2
gravatar for user230613
3.6 years ago by
user230613280 wrote:

Hi guys,

As far as I've read, both SomaticSniper and Varscan variant calling algorithms have been developed by the same group. Do you have any experience of which one is more accurate? Or in which conditions should I use one or the other?

Thank you in advance,

ADD COMMENTlink modified 3.6 years ago by Chris Miller21k • written 3.6 years ago by user230613280
gravatar for Chris Miller
3.6 years ago by
Chris Miller21k
Washington University in St. Louis, MO
Chris Miller21k wrote:

It just depends on what you're doing. Somatic Sniper has largely been superceded by a new generation of callers (Mutect, Strelka, etc) but is still useful in the niche case of having tumor contamination in your normal sample (very few other callers are designed to handle this case). In general, VarScan has kept up with the times pretty well.

That said, relying on a single caller is probably not your best bet. Each has strengths and weaknesses, and an ensemble approach followed by intelligent merging is probably your best bet for maximizing your performance.

ADD COMMENTlink written 3.6 years ago by Chris Miller21k

Thank you very much! However I don't get you point about the advantages of using SomaticSniper when tumor contamination is expected in normal sample. As far as I can read in Varscan2 help, Varscan2 can handle this issue with the following two arguments:

--normal-purity - Estimated purity (non-tumor content) of normal sample [1.00]
--tumor-purity - Estimated purity (tumor content)

Am I missing something?

ADD REPLYlink written 3.6 years ago by user230613280
gravatar for TriS
3.6 years ago by
United States, Buffalo
TriS4.2k wrote:

there are a number of papers out there comparing them (with other variant callers). examples are:

Evaluation of Nine Somatic Variant Callers for Detection of Somatic Mutations in Exome and Targeted Deep Sequencing Data Detecting somatic point mutations in cancer genome sequencing data: a comparison of mutation callers A comparative analysis of algorithms for somatic SNV detection in cancer

ADD COMMENTlink written 3.6 years ago by TriS4.2k
Please log in to add an answer.


Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 872 users visited in the last hour