Question: What Sequence Features Are Of Greatest Importance In Prediction Of Protein Protein Docking?
2
gravatar for Eminencegrise
10.0 years ago by
Eminencegrise210
Eminencegrise210 wrote:

My questions pertains to features that can solely be derived from sequence. Would You think the that docking domains are specific to terminal regions? In other words I have a set of potential substrates. Do I have to consider the entire chain of amino acids? For example in MEKS I would solely consider the N terminal regions yet once I am working with all sorts of proteins I am not sure.

interaction docking • 2.3k views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 7.0 years ago by Biostar ♦♦ 20 • written 10.0 years ago by Eminencegrise210
2
gravatar for Will
10.0 years ago by
Will4.5k
United States
Will4.5k wrote:

I'm a big fan of the ELM database. This curates a list of small motifs (regular expressions) which are known to facilitate various forms of binding. PROSITE domains also represent similar sets of information.

As to whether they are likely to be on terminal regions? I would not make that assumption, there are certainly examples of N (or C) terminal recognition sequences but I do not think that they generalize to all protein-protein interactions.

A simple ELM scan of the entire human proteome does not reveal a terminal preference (p = 0.35 when testing the distance from N or C terminal).

ADD COMMENTlink written 10.0 years ago by Will4.5k

I agree ELM is indeed comprehensive

ADD REPLYlink written 9.9 years ago by Eminencegrise210
1
gravatar for Neilfws
10.0 years ago by
Neilfws49k
Sydney, Australia
Neilfws49k wrote:

Terminii often make good docking/interaction targets since they tend to be flexible, solvent-accessible and disordered. However, interaction domains are not specific to terminii; there are plenty of examples of flexible loop regions internal to the sequence that form intermolecular interactions.

I'd suggest searching PubMed for a recent review on the state of the art in prediction of protein-protein interaction. Most approaches use a combination of features: structural, physicochemical, sequence conservation.

ADD COMMENTlink written 10.0 years ago by Neilfws49k
0
gravatar for Khader Shameer
10.0 years ago by
Manhattan, NY
Khader Shameer18k wrote:

Prediction of protein-protein docking or protein-protein interaction prediction?

Will already suggested some interesting features that you may consider. IMHO, this is an important problem in the application of machine learning approaches in bioinformatics and several interesting papers with a variety of features based on the concepts of evolution, domain-domain interaction, sequence similarity, homology... etc are available. If you are new to the this particular area, I would recommend you to start with some of the review articles (1, 2, 3 and several other review articles via PubMed/IEEE/Google).

Then, you need to look in to individual papers to understand the advances in this particular areas for Some of the interesting approaches that used sequence features for predictions (4, 5 etc..)

Due to the availability of several algorithms using sequence based features in this domain your challenge will be using set of novel features or generate hybrid features using available features to get better prediction results. In a recent work, I have used hybrid features by combining two or more sequence features and noticed better contribution of those features in overall prediction.

I would also like to point you to a recent question discussed at Biostar on Sequence based protein interaction information that discussed some of the available tools for protein-protein interaction.

ADD COMMENTlink modified 13 months ago by RamRS30k • written 10.0 years ago by Khader Shameer18k
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1963 users visited in the last hour