Question: GSEA top genes vs all platform
1
gravatar for ra2967
7 months ago by
ra296710
ra296710 wrote:

Hello,

I have done an analysis in LIMMA to obtain the differential expressed genes. However, now I have 2 questions when I perform GSEA:

  • Must I order my samples by fold change (first negative and after positive forld change, por example) in a preranked analysis? Is it better to order by p.val? Can I give the list obtained by limma directly in GSEA?

  • GSEA is usually done with the top genes (let's say, the top 50-100 genes) or must I use THE WHOLE platform (all the 30K probes)?

Thanks in advance

ADD COMMENTlink modified 7 months ago by Charles Warden6.5k • written 7 months ago by ra296710
1

Have a loot at this thread, may be helpful

ADD REPLYlink modified 7 months ago • written 7 months ago by Prakash730

You can also use gene set tests included in the limma package, i.e. CAMERA and ROAST. CAMERA, in particular, is way, way faster than GSEA. Prof. Smyth has made the MSigDB gene sets available in easy to ingest .rda files at his website: http://bioinf.wehi.edu.au/software/MSigDB/index.html

ADD REPLYlink written 7 months ago by glocke01160
2
gravatar for Charles Warden
7 months ago by
Charles Warden6.5k
Duarte, CA
Charles Warden6.5k wrote:

GSEA is typically performed on the whole platform, without the differential expression step.

However, you are correct that a pre-ranked list is another option.

ADD COMMENTlink written 7 months ago by Charles Warden6.5k
1
gravatar for Rashedul Islam
7 months ago by
Canada
Rashedul Islam290 wrote:

Instead of using pre-ranked with 50-100 genes, you can use entire set. Then check how many genes have core GSEA enrichment and are differentially expressed.

ADD COMMENTlink written 7 months ago by Rashedul Islam290
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1325 users visited in the last hour