Error Parsing Text Sam File. Mapq Should Be 0 For Unmapped Read.;
2
1
Entering edit mode
11.1 years ago
joaslucas ▴ 90

Hi everyone, I run my trasncriptome Data against 16a and 23s using BWA. I recovered the unaligned samples, but when convert them back to fastq (using Picard) I get the following error message:

Exception in thread "main" net.sf.samtools.SAMFormatException: Error parsing text SAM file. MAPQ should be 0 for unmapped read.; Line 31992

Is that really important? I believe I might be losing part of the data that could also be analysed.

The whole message is bellow: $ picard-tools SamToFastq I=/S4/S_4_unaligned.sam F=/S4/S_4_unaligned.fastq [Thu Mar 28 07:26:02 PDT 2013] net.sf.picard.sam.SamToFastq INPUT=/S4/S_4_unaligned.sam FASTQ=/S4/S_4_unaligned.fastq OUTPUT_PER_RG=false RE_REVERSE=true INCLUDE_NON_PF_READS=false READ1_TRIM=0 READ2_TRIM=0 TMP_DIR=/tmp/joas VERBOSITY=INFO QUIET=false VALIDATION_STRINGENCY=STRICT COMPRESSION_LEVEL=5 MAX_RECORDS_IN_RAM=500000 CREATE_INDEX=false CREATE_MD5_FILE=false [Thu Mar 28 07:26:03 PDT 2013] net.sf.picard.sam.SamToFastq done. Elapsed time: 0.02 minutes. Runtime.totalMemory()=123928576

Exception in thread "main" net.sf.samtools.SAMFormatException: Error parsing text SAM file. MAPQ should be 0 for unmapped read.; Line 31992 Line: H-161:169:c10paacxx:2:1102:16019:35189 20 gi|448814763:1471846-1473382 4674 37 50M * 0 0 TTAGAAAGGAGGTGATCCAGCCGCACCTTCCGGTACGGCTACCTTGTTAC ##C=IHEG@@C=B8=8IIIFJIGG?JJJIJIJJIIJJHHHHHFFFFFCCC XT:A:U NM:i:1 X0:i:1 X1:i:0 XM:i:1 XO:i:0 XG:i:0 MD:Z:0C1 at net.sf.samtools.SAMTextReader.reportErrorParsingLine(SAMTextReader.java:224) at net.sf.samtools.SAMTextReader.access$500(SAMTextReader.java:40) at net.sf.samtools.SAMTextReader$RecordIterator.parseLine(SAMTextReader.java:428) at net.sf.samtools.SAMTextReader$RecordIterator.next(SAMTextReader.java:272) at net.sf.samtools.SAMTextReader$RecordIterator.next(SAMTextReader.java:244) at net.sf.samtools.SAMFileReader$AssertableIterator.next(SAMFileReader.java:629) at net.sf.samtools.SAMFileReader$AssertableIterator.next(SAMFileReader.java:607) at net.sf.picard.sam.SamToFastq.doWork(SamToFastq.java:121) at net.sf.picard.cmdline.CommandLineProgram.instanceMain(CommandLineProgram.java:158) at net.sf.picard.sam.SamToFastq.main(SamToFastq.java:112)

Thanks

picard bwa • 8.4k views
ADD COMMENT
2
Entering edit mode
11.1 years ago

It's not a big deal, that's just what bwa does to reads that hang off of the ends of references. Use VALIDATION_STRINGENCY=LENIENT in Picard, and it will ignore that error.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

To use VALIDATION_STRINGENCY=LENIENT is the right thing to do. However, if you don't, it is a big deal if you don't since the output that Picard produced will be truncated.

ADD REPLY
0
0
Entering edit mode

Yes, that's a top hit on Google for the error message. It's an annoying issue and it comes up a lot. See also this thread here, Question: Final solution for "MAPQ should be 0 for unmapped read.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2570 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6