What sequencing read aligners other than RazerS guarantee full sensitivity?
0
0
Entering edit mode
5.9 years ago
adam.nunn • 0

Does anybody have recommendations for current tools similar to RazerS3 in this regard, particularly that handle PE reads and output to SAM format but this is not strictly necessary.

alignment sequence • 1.0k views
ADD COMMENT
2
Entering edit mode

If by "full sensitivity" you are looking for an "all-mapper" as defined on RazerS3 paper, there is BitMapper, FEM, Hobbes, mrFAST, SHRiMP2 and Yara. I never used any of them, tough.

edit: added FEM.

ADD REPLY
2
Entering edit mode

I used Shrimp2 for SOLiD back in the day I believe (2011). Pretty poor. mrFAST was far, far worse. We should be very glad to have tools like bwa, STAR, and bowtie2. Just my two cents. Novoalign allows a lot of parameter tuning, but is commercial. Segemehl http://hoffmann.bioinf.uni-leipzig.de/LIFE/segemehl.html might also fit your bill.

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode

But are the aligners at fault, or is it the data? Though I haven't dealt a lot with SOLiD, all data sets I've seen were bad.

Anyway, you are right in the "best-mappers" won against the "all-mappers", they generally give better (or good enough) results a lot faster.

@adam.nunn, beware of the requirements from the mapper you choose. For example, mrFAST (and maybe BitMapper) requires allreads to be same length, that is, no adapter trimming can be performed - you either don't trim adapters, or discard reads with adapters.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks for the suggestions! Specifically I'm looking for all-mappers that are capable of finding every single occurrence of a read within a tolerated edit or Hamming distance, ie no trade-offs for performance reasons. For working with illumina reads of 100-150 bp approximately.

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode

bbmap.sh from BBMap suite can probably do that well. There are a ton of options and you will need to experiment.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Please do not post the same comment twice. If people keep asking for details means that your comment was not clear.

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode

It is unclear what you mean with 'full sensitivity', and what your application is. The recommendations for aligners would be quite different if you have short read Illumina WGS, RNA-seq or long read nanopore/PacBio data.

Please elaborate. As far as I know all modern aligners can handle PE reads and support SAM format.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Ah yes, sorry. I'm looking for all-mappers that are capable of finding every single occurrence of a read within a tolerated edit or Hamming distance, ie no trade-offs for performance reasons. For working with illumina reads of 100-150 bp approximately.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2646 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6