Forum: Single-end sequencing versus paired-end
0
gravatar for Sujata
7 weeks ago by
Sujata0
india
Sujata0 wrote:

Single run is used for counting or differential gene expression, while paired-run is used for splice variants, mutations etc. Why?

ADD COMMENTlink modified 7 weeks ago • written 7 weeks ago by Sujata0

Single versus Paired-end

So, if a single-end reads spans across two exons, will it not be possible to figure out the same here?

ADD REPLYlink written 7 weeks ago by Sujata0
1

It should be possible to do that. Only difference is here you are going to be looking at say 50-100 bp read. Where as with a paired-end data you are sampling a 350-450 bp fragment.

ADD REPLYlink modified 7 weeks ago • written 7 weeks ago by genomax80k
2
gravatar for genomax
7 weeks ago by
genomax80k
United States
genomax80k wrote:

I will refer you to following diagram that should explain how paired-end reads provide information about how long the fragment is that is being sequenced when a reference is available for mapping (Image comes from A: What is the different between Read and Fragment in RNA-seq? ). Two reads coming from the fragment being sequenced would align much farther apart than just the size of the insert, if the fragment contains a splice site.

Single-end reads would be equivalent to Read 1 or Read 2 on its own without the mate.

ADD COMMENTlink modified 7 weeks ago • written 7 weeks ago by genomax80k

Thank you for your reply @genomax. However, I did not understand your statement "Two reads coming from the fragment being sequenced would align much farther apart than just the size of the insert, if the fragment contains a splice site". Still, I am a bit confused about when to use single and paired-end sequencing?

ADD REPLYlink written 7 weeks ago by Sujata0

See image below. Red or gray bars connected with dotted lines represent two ends of fragments that originated from exons being spliced together (don't worry about different types of splicing depicted). Paired-end reads sequence the two ends of such fragments. By aligning the data to the reference one will be able to figure out that those two reads came from two exons that are a certain distance apart in the genome (> size of the fragment sequenced). If you are interested in this type of information (even if you don't have a reference, since you can do de novo transcriptome assembly with such data) they you will want to do paired-end sequencing. If you were interested in long scale genome rearrangements (e.g. translocations in cancer etc) then you will want to do paired-end sequencing (though no splicing will be involved here).

(source: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2019.01152/ ).

If you have tight budgets then you could save some money by doing single-end sequencing for pure counting applications. For applications like ChIPseq you can do single end sequencing since you are not really looking for information w.r.t the reference at a longer distance.

ADD REPLYlink modified 7 weeks ago • written 7 weeks ago by genomax80k
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1338 users visited in the last hour