Strange MA-plot using DESeq2
2
0
Entering edit mode
6.4 years ago
Cecelia ▴ 30

I am running DESeq2 to perform a differential expression analysis two treatment conditions (Treat vs. Control) of a wasp infection in a beetle species. However I got some strange looking MA-plot when comparing some conditions.

There is an obvious set of outlier red dots in the down-regulated region that looks very strange. Can anybody explain what causes such results?

The count data was imported from Salmon output. The R command I used are below:

Importing data

filesevipus12h<- c("quant1.sf",    
 "quant2.sf",
 "quant3.sf",
 "quant4.sf",
 "quant5.sf",
 "quant6.sf")

names(filesevipus12h) <- c("Treat_12h_rep1",  "Treat_12h_rep2",  "Treat_12h_rep3",  "Control_12h_rep1",  
"Control_12h_rep2",  "Control_12h_rep3")
txifilesevipus12h <- tximport(filesevipus12h, type="salmon", tx2gene=tx2genepus)

DE analysis

ddsTCpus12 <- DESeqDataSetFromTximport(txifilesevipus12h, colData=colDatapus12,
                                   design=~ Treatment)
ddsTCpus12 <- DESeq(ddsTCpus12)

MA plot

pus12res <- results(ddsTCpus12, alpha=0.05)
plotMA(pus12res, main=paste0('G. pusilla'), ylim=c(-8,8))

Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks

enter image description here

I am having problem inserting images in biostar, the direct link to the DEseq2 image is below:

https://ibb.co/mgnzQ6

RNA-Seq R Deseq2 • 9.7k views
ADD COMMENT
2
Entering edit mode

This looks mostly like the genes really do just change mostly in one direction. The normalization is a bit off center, but it's not terrible.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Please post image to understand the issue better.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

I've corrected the link for the image.

ADD REPLY
3
Entering edit mode
6.4 years ago
sHeyne ▴ 30

The red cloud at the bottom looks like a contamination from some other cell/tissue type (in case of eg. mouse or human). In your case, all samples/replicates are from "whole body" beetles? Don't know how this then could happen...

In order to see if this effect relates to one or more replicates, you can check all pairwise correlation plots of your replicates. You should see a clear, reoccurring stripe next to the diagonal for certain samples. If you leave then out this sample(s), your MA-plot should look more normal.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks for your suggestions! But could you explain more about the pairwise correlation plots of the replicates? What R function should I apply then?

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode

Just out of interest, did you find out if the statement of sHeyne suggesting contamination was true? I do not really understand how one would make the connection from a cloud of apparently downregulated genes to contamination by other cells.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

"Whole body beetles" indicates that it wasn't just beetle, but beetle et al. that was/were sequenced. But sHeyne also claims there can't be any contamination (in this case) in the same breath. That answer sounds suspect.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
5.4 years ago
Renesh ★ 2.2k

Easy to understand and visualize MA plot for gene expression data: https://reneshbedre.github.io/blog/ma.html

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2548 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6