3
votes
2
replies
822
views
1
vote
2
replies
1.5k
views
2
votes
4
replies
1.9k
views
24 months ago by
microorganism_001
▴
30
2
votes
3
replies
1.0k
views
24 months ago by
Axzd
▴
80
0
votes
1
reply
672
views
0
votes
3
replies
1.9k
views
2
votes
4
replies
1.2k
views
24 months ago by
alwayshope
▴
40
4
votes
7
replies
1.5k
views
1
vote
4
replies
1.4k
views
24 months ago by
Assa Yeroslaviz
★
1.9k
2
votes
4
replies
1.4k
views
24 months ago by
Chris
▴
360
0
votes
1
reply
883
views
0
votes
0
replies
696
views
Forum:
Automated Checks And QA
24 months ago by
Sasha
▴
850
1
vote
3
replies
930
views
0
votes
0
replies
485
views
0
votes
4
replies
1.5k
views
0
votes
4
replies
2.1k
views
0
votes
0
replies
406
views
1
vote
1
reply
726
views
updated 24 months ago by
Ram
45k
•
written 24 months ago by
shivangi.agarwal800
▴
120
2
votes
3
replies
3.4k
views
0
votes
9
replies
2.2k
views
updated 24 months ago by
Pierre Lindenbaum
166k
•
written 24 months ago by
otieno43
▴
40
0
votes
1
reply
692
views
0
votes
4
replies
1.2k
views
4
votes
14
replies
8.4k
views
24 months ago by
Biomed-jeh
▴
70
1
vote
0
replies
584
views
0
votes
4
replies
1.3k
views
1
vote
3
replies
1.2k
views
24 months ago by
sil_bioinfo
▴
60
4
votes
3
replies
1.4k
views
0
votes
2
replies
1.2k
views
0
votes
0
replies
499
views
24 months ago by
1769mkc
★
1.3k
6
votes
2
replies
3.2k
views
0
votes
2
replies
973
views
24 months ago by
dalibenam64
•
0
0
votes
7
replies
1.4k
views
3
votes
5
replies
1.9k
views
0
votes
1
reply
819
views
1
vote
1
reply
548
views
updated 24 months ago by
Ram
45k
•
written 24 months ago by
ankit.yadav
•
0
1
vote
2
replies
706
views
0
votes
1
reply
1.4k
views
0
votes
3
replies
1.0k
views
3
votes
7
replies
2.1k
views
1
vote
2
replies
984
views
24 months ago by
a5864557
▴
10
0
votes
2
replies
1.5k
views
0
votes
2
replies
1.1k
views
1
vote
1
reply
733
views
updated 24 months ago by
Ram
45k
•
written 24 months ago by
pradipnile4
•
0
1
vote
1
reply
878
views
1
vote
1
reply
601
views
updated 24 months ago by
GenoMax
154k
•
written 24 months ago by
pradipnile4
•
0
3
votes
4
replies
2.1k
views
0
votes
3
replies
1.7k
views
5
votes
6
replies
5.8k
views
1
vote
3
replies
1.7k
views
0
votes
1
reply
714
views
Recent Votes
Recent Locations •
All
United States, 1 minute ago
Columbus, OH, 3 minutes ago
outer space, 22 minutes ago
Whitefish, MT, 24 minutes ago
UCLA, 26 minutes ago
United Kingdom, 32 minutes ago
United Kingdom, 44 minutes ago
Recent Awards •
All
Popular Question to
raquel
•
0
Popular Question to
Jeremy Leipzig
23k
Teacher to
GouthamAtla
12k
Popular Question to
sacha
★
2.5k
Popular Question to
Ann
▴
40
Popular Question to
iamsmor
•
0
Recent Replies
Comment: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
dsull
★
7.7k
If those logFCs are different, then that's a normalization issue.
The logFC is straight forward arithmetic (it's simply dividing mean of […
Comment: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
vernonlim98
•
0
Thanks both for your input. It got me to look at the published methodologies more closely, and you guys were right. One paper that I was re…
Comment: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
vernonlim98
•
0
Yes it does not match at all, and those genes that are common in both analysis results have very different logFC and p values
Comment: Errors with RSEM/bowtie2
by
Olivia
•
0
I am not sure what you mean by this, but I believe that is what I did. With Trinity, I matched all the paired reads together, so they shoul…
Answer: Gene expression equivalent of polygenic risk score ?
by
GouthamAtla
12k
I don't think something exists out of the box. With variants, we have a 'weight' for each variant on disease risk (obtained through large s…
Comment: ESTIMATE (Estimation of STromal and Immune cells in MAlignant Tumor tissues usin
by
Ben
•
0
write.table(df1, "df1.txt",
sep = "\t",
row.names = T,
col.names = T,
quote = FALSE)
Comment: Errors with RSEM/bowtie2
by
GenoMax
154k
That is good confirmation. Bacl to the error message.
> I don't know how to fix this, given that I already did the trimming steps.
DId yo…
Comment: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
dsull
★
7.7k
Honestly, those things shouldn't result in a considerable discrepancy.
The largest difference will come from the post-processing & analysi…
Answer: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
Ales
▴
50
I second the comment about comparing the top 100 genes - if you see vastly different results, I would lean closer to examining protocols th…
Answer: Help interpreting BLASTn results and phylogenetic tree for genetics practical
by
Mensur Dlakic
★
30k
I think what you are asking involves too much work for anyone to explain it in granular detail. But who knows, maybe there is a good soul o…
Answer: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
yura.grabovska
▴
830
When you say vastly different, what do you mean exactly? Does your top 100 up/down not match theirs at all?
Comment: Functional prediction for proteins of bacteria.
by
colindaven
8.0k
Have a look at tools like SnpEff or Ensembl VEP. Perhaps your bacterial sp is included.
Comment: Errors with RSEM/bowtie2
by
Olivia
•
0
Yes, I already made the transcriptome with these tools, and the CD-HIT-EST fasta file is the transcript file that I am using for RSEM. Then…
Comment: sra-explorer : find SRA and FastQ download URLs in a couple of clicks
by
Guilherme
•
0
Oh, ok. It seems like NCBI stores the files in SRA format (thus needing conversion and database lookups by sra toolkit tools) and EBI store…
Comment: help with modkit on nanopore sequencing data.
by
andres.firrincieli
3.9k
On the DMR tutorial page, they retrieve Human CpG Islands from the UCSC Table Browser. You can do the same thing for Mouse CpG Islands. Hav…
Traffic: 4554 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6