updated 2.0 years ago by
Ram
45k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
Manuel Sokolov Ravasqueira
▴
110
0
votes
0
replies
560
views
1
vote
3
replies
2.8k
views
updated 24 months ago by
AndyLiang
•
0
•
written 4.4 years ago by
sidrah.maryam
▴
70
2
votes
4
replies
5.6k
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
Matteo Schiavinato
★
3.7k
•
written 7.5 years ago by
leandro.bispo.oliveira
•
0
4
votes
3
replies
2.0k
views
1
vote
5
replies
1.1k
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
GenoMax
154k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
sil_bioinfo
▴
60
4
votes
16
replies
4.0k
views
0
votes
0
replies
734
views
2.0 years ago by
optimistsso4co3
▴
140
4
votes
6
replies
1.8k
views
0
votes
0
replies
814
views
2
votes
2
replies
1.1k
views
1
vote
2
replies
975
views
3
votes
3
replies
1.6k
views
1
vote
3
replies
1.3k
views
2.0 years ago by
synat.keam
▴
120
3
votes
3
replies
1.1k
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
jared.andrews07
★
19k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
qudrat.nii
▴
40
1
vote
1
reply
669
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
jared.andrews07
★
19k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
Vishal
▴
10
4
votes
5
replies
4.5k
views
6 follow
2
votes
5
replies
1.5k
views
1
vote
5
replies
1.5k
views
8
votes
5
replies
1.7k
views
1
vote
2
replies
945
views
24 months ago by
Mat
▴
80
2
votes
5
replies
1.6k
views
0
votes
0
replies
482
views
2
votes
5
replies
1.9k
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
Michael Love
★
2.6k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
Alexandre Eeckhoutte
•
0
5
votes
3
replies
1.3k
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
Ram
45k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
_quantum_girl_
▴
60
0
votes
2
replies
1.0k
views
2.0 years ago by
langziv
▴
70
0
votes
0
replies
521
views
2
votes
4
replies
3.2k
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
Ram
45k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
_quantum_girl_
▴
60
10
votes
6
replies
2.3k
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
GenoMax
154k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
sil_bioinfo
▴
60
4
votes
3
replies
1.6k
views
0
votes
2
replies
925
views
1
vote
3
replies
1.2k
views
2.0 years ago by
dalibenam64
•
0
0
votes
4
replies
1.2k
views
15
votes
16
replies
3.4k
views
1
vote
4
replies
1.3k
views
2.0 years ago by
langziv
▴
70
2
votes
4
replies
1.7k
views
0
votes
3
replies
1.1k
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
Jordan M Eizenga
▴
760
•
written 2.0 years ago by
Qi
•
0
0
votes
1
reply
748
views
8
votes
6
replies
2.1k
views
0
votes
6
replies
1.8k
views
2.0 years ago by
kirankumareripogu
▴
10
0
votes
8
replies
2.2k
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
Ram
45k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
seattlescientist_01
•
0
1
vote
8
replies
6.0k
views
2.0 years ago by
bioinfo
▴
160
0
votes
7
replies
2.4k
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
barslmn
★
2.4k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
PoscaXVIII
•
0
0
votes
4
replies
1.1k
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
Ram
45k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
emiliomastriani
▴
40
0
votes
1
reply
800
views
0
votes
1
reply
963
views
3
votes
3
replies
3.8k
views
0
votes
0
replies
552
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
Ram
45k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
eimanpharmacist
▴
20
3
votes
0
replies
995
views
1
vote
5
replies
2.0k
views
0
votes
1
reply
991
views
Recent Votes
Recent Locations •
All
UCLA, 23 minutes ago
Norway, 27 minutes ago
United Kingdom, 29 minutes ago
Estonia, 33 minutes ago
Hinxton, UK, 41 minutes ago
France/Nantes/Institut du Thorax - INSERM UMR1087, 54 minutes ago
Australia, 1 hour ago
Recent Awards •
All
Popular Question to
predeus
★
2.1k
Popular Question to
raquel
•
0
Popular Question to
Jeremy Leipzig
23k
Teacher to
GouthamAtla
12k
Popular Question to
sacha
★
2.5k
Popular Question to
Ann
▴
40
Recent Replies
Comment: Gene expression equivalent of polygenic risk score ?
by
Picasa
▴
690
Thanks a lot for your answer. I will check the paper.
Comment: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
dsull
★
7.7k
If those logFCs are different, then that's a normalization issue.
The logFC is straight forward arithmetic (it's simply dividing mean of […
Comment: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
vernonlim98
•
0
Thanks both for your input. It got me to look at the published methodologies more closely, and you guys were right. One paper that I was re…
Comment: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
vernonlim98
•
0
Yes it does not match at all, and those genes that are common in both analysis results have very different logFC and p values
Comment: Errors with RSEM/bowtie2
by
Olivia
•
0
I am not sure what you mean by this, but I believe that is what I did. With Trinity, I matched all the paired reads together, so they shoul…
Answer: Gene expression equivalent of polygenic risk score ?
by
GouthamAtla
12k
I don't think something exists out of the box. With variants, we have a 'weight' for each variant on disease risk (obtained through large s…
Comment: ESTIMATE (Estimation of STromal and Immune cells in MAlignant Tumor tissues usin
by
Ben
•
0
write.table(df1, "df1.txt",
sep = "\t",
row.names = T,
col.names = T,
quote = FALSE)
Comment: Errors with RSEM/bowtie2
by
GenoMax
154k
That is good confirmation. Bacl to the error message.
> I don't know how to fix this, given that I already did the trimming steps.
DId yo…
Comment: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
dsull
★
7.7k
Honestly, those things shouldn't result in a considerable discrepancy.
The largest difference will come from the post-processing & analysi…
Answer: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
Ales
▴
50
I second the comment about comparing the top 100 genes - if you see vastly different results, I would lean closer to examining protocols th…
Answer: Help interpreting BLASTn results and phylogenetic tree for genetics practical
by
Mensur Dlakic
★
30k
I think what you are asking involves too much work for anyone to explain it in granular detail. But who knows, maybe there is a good soul o…
Answer: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
yura.grabovska
▴
830
When you say vastly different, what do you mean exactly? Does your top 100 up/down not match theirs at all?
Comment: Functional prediction for proteins of bacteria.
by
colindaven
8.0k
Have a look at tools like SnpEff or Ensembl VEP. Perhaps your bacterial sp is included.
Comment: Errors with RSEM/bowtie2
by
Olivia
•
0
Yes, I already made the transcriptome with these tools, and the CD-HIT-EST fasta file is the transcript file that I am using for RSEM. Then…
Comment: sra-explorer : find SRA and FastQ download URLs in a couple of clicks
by
Guilherme
•
0
Oh, ok. It seems like NCBI stores the files in SRA format (thus needing conversion and database lookups by sra toolkit tools) and EBI store…
Traffic: 3366 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6