0
votes
1
reply
991
views
1
vote
1
reply
1.0k
views
0
votes
2
replies
1.7k
views
0
votes
2
replies
992
views
0
votes
6
replies
1.7k
views
5
votes
7
replies
1.9k
views
0
votes
4
replies
1.4k
views
0
votes
4
replies
1.8k
views
updated 23 months ago by
Brian Bushnell
20k
•
written 3.1 years ago by
davidmaimoun
▴
50
1
vote
5
replies
1.5k
views
4
votes
6
replies
4.8k
views
7 follow
4
votes
11
replies
3.3k
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
Yogi
▴
70
•
written 2.0 years ago by
Anisur Rahman
▴
80
0
votes
1
reply
627
views
3
votes
2
replies
1.0k
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
Basti
★
2.1k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
epianalysis
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
649
views
2.0 years ago by
PeterC_NCBI
▴
520
1
vote
3
replies
1.1k
views
3
votes
4
replies
1.1k
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
LChart
5.1k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
_quantum_girl_
▴
60
1
vote
4
replies
3.9k
views
0
votes
1
reply
759
views
0
votes
1
reply
816
views
0
votes
2
replies
944
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
Alex Reynolds
36k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
Carrie
•
0
7
votes
7
replies
2.1k
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
jared.andrews07
★
19k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
Chris
▴
360
2
votes
6
replies
1.8k
views
2.0 years ago by
aminijavad4
▴
10
0
votes
0
replies
442
views
2.0 years ago by
Fabio_bie88
•
0
2
votes
0
replies
994
views
0
votes
1
reply
2.2k
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
Ram
45k
•
written 9.3 years ago by
gerrychang1985
▴
40
3
votes
14
replies
3.4k
views
10 follow
updated 2.0 years ago by
Joe
22k
•
written 4.4 years ago by
hannahcheyenna
•
0
1
vote
1
reply
1.2k
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
shelkmike
★
1.8k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
RelativeOptics
▴
40
0
votes
6
replies
1.3k
views
2.0 years ago by
biology_inform
▴
60
0
votes
1
reply
455
views
7
votes
9
replies
2.2k
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
svp
▴
690
•
written 2.0 years ago by
smrutimayipanda
▴
20
0
votes
0
replies
826
views
1
vote
2
replies
876
views
1
vote
9
replies
2.1k
views
2.0 years ago by
nikhil
▴
20
2
votes
3
replies
1.6k
views
0
votes
0
replies
1.2k
views
2
votes
4
replies
3.0k
views
2.0 years ago by
camillab.
▴
160
0
votes
4
replies
1.9k
views
updated 24 months ago by
Ram
45k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
shakyaram079
•
0
2
votes
5
replies
1.6k
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
Kevin Blighe
89k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
Nicolas
•
0
0
votes
4
replies
2.1k
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
chrchang523
11k
•
written 2.1 years ago by
curious
▴
890
1
vote
4
replies
1.1k
views
2.0 years ago by
Mo
▴
50
1
vote
5
replies
1.4k
views
18
votes
10
replies
3.5k
views
8 follow
3
votes
4
replies
1.6k
views
0
votes
0
replies
719
views
23 months ago by
Physalia-courses
★
2.6k
6
votes
2
replies
1.7k
views
0
votes
1
reply
713
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
barslmn
★
2.4k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
smrutimayipanda
▴
20
4
votes
6
replies
1.8k
views
2
votes
5
replies
3.0k
views
1
vote
5
replies
1.5k
views
0
votes
0
replies
734
views
Recent Votes
Recent Locations •
All
United States, 20 minutes ago
USA, 1 hour ago
United States, 1 hour ago
United States, 1 hour ago
UCLA, 1 hour ago
Norway, 1 hour ago
United Kingdom, 2 hours ago
Recent Awards •
All
Popular Question to
a615ebfb
▴
60
Popular Question to
predeus
★
2.1k
Popular Question to
raquel
•
0
Popular Question to
Jeremy Leipzig
23k
Teacher to
GouthamAtla
12k
Popular Question to
sacha
★
2.5k
Popular Question to
Ann
▴
40
Recent Replies
Comment: Gene expression equivalent of polygenic risk score ?
by
Picasa
▴
690
Thanks a lot for your answer. I will check the paper.
Comment: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
dsull
★
7.7k
If those logFCs are different, then that's a normalization issue.
The logFC is straight forward arithmetic (it's simply dividing mean of […
Comment: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
vernonlim98
•
0
Thanks both for your input. It got me to look at the published methodologies more closely, and you guys were right. One paper that I was re…
Comment: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
vernonlim98
•
0
Yes it does not match at all, and those genes that are common in both analysis results have very different logFC and p values
Comment: Errors with RSEM/bowtie2
by
Olivia
•
0
I am not sure what you mean by this, but I believe that is what I did. With Trinity, I matched all the paired reads together, so they shoul…
Answer: Gene expression equivalent of polygenic risk score ?
by
GouthamAtla
12k
I don't think something exists out of the box. With variants, we have a 'weight' for each variant on disease risk (obtained through large s…
Comment: ESTIMATE (Estimation of STromal and Immune cells in MAlignant Tumor tissues usin
by
Ben
•
0
write.table(df1, "df1.txt",
sep = "\t",
row.names = T,
col.names = T,
quote = FALSE)
Comment: Errors with RSEM/bowtie2
by
GenoMax
154k
That is good confirmation. Bacl to the error message.
> I don't know how to fix this, given that I already did the trimming steps.
DId yo…
Comment: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
dsull
★
7.7k
Honestly, those things shouldn't result in a considerable discrepancy.
The largest difference will come from the post-processing & analysi…
Answer: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
Ales
▴
50
I second the comment about comparing the top 100 genes - if you see vastly different results, I would lean closer to examining protocols th…
Answer: Help interpreting BLASTn results and phylogenetic tree for genetics practical
by
Mensur Dlakic
★
30k
I think what you are asking involves too much work for anyone to explain it in granular detail. But who knows, maybe there is a good soul o…
Answer: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
yura.grabovska
▴
830
When you say vastly different, what do you mean exactly? Does your top 100 up/down not match theirs at all?
Comment: Functional prediction for proteins of bacteria.
by
colindaven
8.0k
Have a look at tools like SnpEff or Ensembl VEP. Perhaps your bacterial sp is included.
Comment: Errors with RSEM/bowtie2
by
Olivia
•
0
Yes, I already made the transcriptome with these tools, and the CD-HIT-EST fasta file is the transcript file that I am using for RSEM. Then…
Comment: sra-explorer : find SRA and FastQ download URLs in a couple of clicks
by
Guilherme
•
0
Oh, ok. It seems like NCBI stores the files in SRA format (thus needing conversion and database lookups by sra toolkit tools) and EBI store…
Traffic: 3200 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6