0
votes
2
replies
3.6k
views
0
votes
0
replies
448
views
1
vote
2
replies
710
views
9
votes
4
replies
17k
views
updated 24 months ago by
filip.buric
▴
10
•
written 2.1 years ago by
sidrah.maryam
▴
70
0
votes
4
replies
1.3k
views
24 months ago by
Saurabh
•
0
3
votes
3
replies
4.0k
views
updated 24 months ago by
Giulio Genovese
▴
630
•
written 24 months ago by
ttom
▴
230
0
votes
0
replies
814
views
updated 24 months ago by
Ram
45k
•
written 24 months ago by
pandey.gaurav
▴
200
0
votes
1
reply
585
views
0
votes
0
replies
510
views
0
votes
0
replies
400
views
0
votes
1
reply
691
views
1
vote
5
replies
1.9k
views
2.0 years ago by
dr-device
▴
10
1
vote
1
reply
1.1k
views
3
votes
26
replies
4.2k
views
6 follow
1
vote
3
replies
1.6k
views
1
vote
2
replies
1.5k
views
0
votes
0
replies
593
views
0
votes
1
reply
645
views
2
votes
3
replies
1.4k
views
6
votes
4
replies
2.6k
views
0
votes
0
replies
557
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
Ram
45k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
Physalia-courses
★
2.6k
1
vote
8
replies
2.7k
views
2.0 years ago by
mbuenner
•
0
2
votes
4
replies
1.3k
views
0
votes
0
replies
511
views
0
votes
2
replies
869
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
Basti
★
2.1k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
jabbari.parnian
▴
30
2
votes
0
replies
948
views
28
votes
16
replies
34k
views
11 follow
updated 23 months ago by
Ram
45k
•
written 16.0 years ago by
Istvan Albert
103k
2
votes
1
reply
1.7k
views
0
votes
1
reply
855
views
2.0 years ago by
睿紘
•
0
0
votes
5
replies
1.4k
views
7
votes
13
replies
2.6k
views
3
votes
3
replies
1.7k
views
0
votes
0
replies
427
views
2.0 years ago by
v.berriosfarias
▴
140
0
votes
0
replies
645
views
2.0 years ago by
avelarbio46
▴
30
0
votes
9
replies
1.5k
views
0
votes
3
replies
1.0k
views
0
votes
0
replies
592
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
Ram
45k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
Physalia-courses
★
2.6k
3
votes
2
replies
1.1k
views
2.0 years ago by
synat.keam
▴
120
2
votes
2
replies
1.5k
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
benformatics
4.2k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
paulaotero.sanchez
•
0
0
votes
2
replies
1.5k
views
updated 5 weeks ago by
octopuslegs11
▴
10
•
written 2.5 years ago by
rocio.castellanos
•
0
3
votes
6
replies
2.0k
views
2
votes
2
replies
957
views
0
votes
20
replies
3.1k
views
23 months ago by
langziv
▴
70
0
votes
0
replies
461
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
Ram
45k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
ayaosama2111
▴
10
0
votes
0
replies
624
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
Ram
45k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
Bioinfonext
▴
480
4
votes
5
replies
1.9k
views
24 months ago by
Begonia_pavonina
▴
210
21
votes
7
replies
14k
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
Gennady Khvorykh
▴
100
•
written 9.5 years ago by
Sukhi Singh
11k
0
votes
1
reply
841
views
1
vote
1
reply
784
views
updated 2.0 years ago by
Pierre Lindenbaum
166k
•
written 2.0 years ago by
Athena
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
479
views
Recent Votes
Recent Locations •
All
United States, 3 minutes ago
France/Nantes/Institut du Thorax - INSERM UMR1087, 6 minutes ago
South Korea, 13 minutes ago
New York, 23 minutes ago
London, United Kingdom, 29 minutes ago
Syracuse, NY, United States, 57 minutes ago
Hinxton, UK, 59 minutes ago
Recent Awards •
All
Popular Question to
predeus
★
2.1k
Popular Question to
raquel
•
0
Popular Question to
Jeremy Leipzig
23k
Teacher to
GouthamAtla
12k
Popular Question to
sacha
★
2.5k
Popular Question to
Ann
▴
40
Recent Replies
Comment: Gene expression equivalent of polygenic risk score ?
by
Picasa
▴
690
Thanks a lot for your answer. I will check the paper.
Comment: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
dsull
★
7.7k
If those logFCs are different, then that's a normalization issue.
The logFC is straight forward arithmetic (it's simply dividing mean of […
Comment: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
vernonlim98
•
0
Thanks both for your input. It got me to look at the published methodologies more closely, and you guys were right. One paper that I was re…
Comment: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
vernonlim98
•
0
Yes it does not match at all, and those genes that are common in both analysis results have very different logFC and p values
Comment: Errors with RSEM/bowtie2
by
Olivia
•
0
I am not sure what you mean by this, but I believe that is what I did. With Trinity, I matched all the paired reads together, so they shoul…
Answer: Gene expression equivalent of polygenic risk score ?
by
GouthamAtla
12k
I don't think something exists out of the box. With variants, we have a 'weight' for each variant on disease risk (obtained through large s…
Comment: ESTIMATE (Estimation of STromal and Immune cells in MAlignant Tumor tissues usin
by
Ben
•
0
write.table(df1, "df1.txt",
sep = "\t",
row.names = T,
col.names = T,
quote = FALSE)
Comment: Errors with RSEM/bowtie2
by
GenoMax
154k
That is good confirmation. Bacl to the error message.
> I don't know how to fix this, given that I already did the trimming steps.
DId yo…
Comment: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
dsull
★
7.7k
Honestly, those things shouldn't result in a considerable discrepancy.
The largest difference will come from the post-processing & analysi…
Answer: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
Ales
▴
50
I second the comment about comparing the top 100 genes - if you see vastly different results, I would lean closer to examining protocols th…
Answer: Help interpreting BLASTn results and phylogenetic tree for genetics practical
by
Mensur Dlakic
★
30k
I think what you are asking involves too much work for anyone to explain it in granular detail. But who knows, maybe there is a good soul o…
Answer: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
yura.grabovska
▴
830
When you say vastly different, what do you mean exactly? Does your top 100 up/down not match theirs at all?
Comment: Functional prediction for proteins of bacteria.
by
colindaven
8.0k
Have a look at tools like SnpEff or Ensembl VEP. Perhaps your bacterial sp is included.
Comment: Errors with RSEM/bowtie2
by
Olivia
•
0
Yes, I already made the transcriptome with these tools, and the CD-HIT-EST fasta file is the transcript file that I am using for RSEM. Then…
Comment: sra-explorer : find SRA and FastQ download URLs in a couple of clicks
by
Guilherme
•
0
Oh, ok. It seems like NCBI stores the files in SRA format (thus needing conversion and database lookups by sra toolkit tools) and EBI store…
Traffic: 3889 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6