1
vote
3
replies
1.0k
views
1
vote
8
replies
8.2k
views
6
votes
5
replies
3.0k
views
updated 2.1 years ago by
Ram
45k
•
written 2.1 years ago by
kalavattam
▴
380
1
vote
2
replies
974
views
2.1 years ago by
Lin
•
0
0
votes
1
reply
3.6k
views
updated 2.1 years ago by
1601693223
•
0
•
written 9.9 years ago by
vicky
▴
30
2
votes
2
replies
1.1k
views
0
votes
0
replies
692
views
updated 2.1 years ago by
Ram
45k
•
written 2.1 years ago by
jalilahmadi1991
•
0
0
votes
1
reply
909
views
1
vote
4
replies
1.5k
views
updated 2.1 years ago by
Pierre Lindenbaum
166k
•
written 2.1 years ago by
Dacheng
•
0
2
votes
1
reply
724
views
2
votes
5
replies
1.4k
views
updated 2.1 years ago by
biofalconch
★
1.3k
•
written 2.1 years ago by
Chris
▴
360
6
votes
6
replies
2.0k
views
updated 2.1 years ago by
Chris
▴
360
•
written 2.1 years ago by
synat.keam
▴
120
0
votes
1
reply
621
views
2.1 years ago by
Mehvi khan
•
0
0
votes
2
replies
2.8k
views
0
votes
0
replies
474
views
1
vote
1
reply
696
views
updated 2.1 years ago by
jared.andrews07
★
19k
•
written 2.1 years ago by
asilvestris
•
0
3
votes
6
replies
3.0k
views
6 follow
2.1 years ago by
anasjamshed
▴
140
0
votes
8
replies
1.8k
views
0
votes
0
replies
471
views
2
votes
4
replies
1.3k
views
2
votes
1
reply
786
views
updated 2.1 years ago by
Ram
45k
•
written 2.1 years ago by
halimaakhter014
•
0
5
votes
7
replies
2.1k
views
7
votes
9
replies
5.4k
views
1
vote
3
replies
1.0k
views
2
votes
4
replies
5.0k
views
updated 2.1 years ago by
Marco Pannone
▴
810
•
written 2.1 years ago by
kenneditodd
▴
50
0
votes
5
replies
1.8k
views
0
votes
2
replies
1.4k
views
2
votes
1
reply
908
views
updated 2.1 years ago by
rfran010
★
1.6k
•
written 2.1 years ago by
Biomed-jeh
▴
70
2
votes
5
replies
2.2k
views
3
votes
5
replies
1.9k
views
2.1 years ago by
Lada
▴
40
2
votes
5
replies
1.7k
views
6 follow
3
votes
4
replies
1.4k
views
updated 2.1 years ago by
Ram
45k
•
written 2.1 years ago by
Pratibha kadam
•
0
0
votes
1
reply
804
views
updated 2.1 years ago by
Ram
45k
•
written 2.1 years ago by
ThePlaintiff
▴
90
3
votes
7
replies
2.8k
views
2
votes
9
replies
2.1k
views
updated 2.1 years ago by
vincenthus
▴
70
•
written 2.1 years ago by
claudiofr
▴
20
2
votes
4
replies
1.1k
views
1
vote
3
replies
1.5k
views
1
vote
2
replies
944
views
2.1 years ago by
Jonathan Yoou
▴
70
1
vote
2
replies
882
views
14 months ago by
Kilian
▴
10
1
vote
6
replies
1.7k
views
3
votes
6
replies
1.8k
views
2.1 years ago by
TheScriptOfGilgamesh
▴
20
0
votes
5
replies
1.4k
views
updated 2.1 years ago by
ATpoint
89k
•
written 2.1 years ago by
harshraje19
▴
50
0
votes
2
replies
1.5k
views
2
votes
3
replies
1.2k
views
0
votes
6
replies
2.0k
views
3
votes
3
replies
1.4k
views
updated 2.1 years ago by
Ram
45k
•
written 2.1 years ago by
aidangcruickshank
▴
10
1
vote
3
replies
1.4k
views
updated 2.1 years ago by
Trivas
★
1.9k
•
written 2.1 years ago by
Marco Pannone
▴
810
3
votes
6
replies
1.6k
views
5
votes
6
replies
6.6k
views
0
votes
8
replies
1.6k
views
updated 2.1 years ago by
bk11
★
3.1k
•
written 2.1 years ago by
bioinformatics
▴
60
Recent Votes
Recent Locations •
All
France/Nantes/Institut du Thorax - INSERM UMR1087, 1 hour ago
Oviedo, 1 hour ago
United Kingdom, 1 hour ago
United States, 1 hour ago
United States, 1 hour ago
United States, 2 hours ago
Australia, 2 hours ago
Recent Awards •
All
Popular Question to
itparanoia
•
0
Popular Question to
arshad1292
▴
110
Popular Question to
marongiu.luigi
▴
760
Popular Question to
a615ebfb
▴
60
Popular Question to
predeus
★
2.1k
Popular Question to
raquel
•
0
Popular Question to
Jeremy Leipzig
23k
Recent Replies
Comment: How to create a consensus of a contig with samtools or bbmap?
by
marongiu.luigi
▴
760
sorry, I have mistaken samtools with spades... running `samtools view -h...` did the trick. Thank you.
Comment: Help with Ideathon
by
V K
•
0
Thank you for the response! Unfortunately this is completely independent and not part of a course. I was asking for some innovative ways to…
Answer: How to create a consensus of a contig with samtools or bbmap?
by
lieven.sterck
16k
You assembled a genome using samtools ???? that sounds very weird, if not impossible ...
The header (SQ lines) is missing from your file b…
Answer: gnomad par region variants
by
benformatics
4.2k
The XX and XY counts are present on any given variants page.
Comment: Help with Ideathon
by
Mensur Dlakic
★
30k
I don't see a single question here. Saying `I need your expert help in figuring out how I can make this analysis useful!` is too open-ended…
Comment: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
ATpoint
89k
Please link the paper, lets see their methods. With human data it can well be that they included something like surrogate variables to damp…
Comment: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
dsull
★
7.7k
There are many ways to do normalization and one of the correct ways is simply to plug raw counts into deseq2 (the math that deseq2 uses to …
Comment: tximport error (medianLengthOverIsoform)
by
rfran010
★
1.6k
Is it the version number in your data?
e.g. ENST00000415118.1 vs ENST00000415118 could be causing the mismatch?
Comment: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
vernonlim98
•
0
So is there any correct way for normalisation? I know limma recommends CPM via limma-voom and DESeq2 just takes in raw counts and does thei…
Comment: Gene expression equivalent of polygenic risk score ?
by
Picasa
▴
690
Thanks a lot for your answer. I will check the paper.
Comment: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
dsull
★
7.7k
If those logFCs are different, then that's a normalization issue.
The logFC is straight forward arithmetic (it's simply dividing mean of […
Comment: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
vernonlim98
•
0
Thanks both for your input. It got me to look at the published methodologies more closely, and you guys were right. One paper that I was re…
Comment: Differences between published differential gene expression results and own analy
by
vernonlim98
•
0
Yes it does not match at all, and those genes that are common in both analysis results have very different logFC and p values
Comment: Errors with RSEM/bowtie2
by
Olivia
•
0
I am not sure what you mean by this, but I believe that is what I did. With Trinity, I matched all the paired reads together, so they shoul…
Answer: Gene expression equivalent of polygenic risk score ?
by
GouthamAtla
12k
I don't think something exists out of the box. With variants, we have a 'weight' for each variant on disease risk (obtained through large s…
Traffic: 3899 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6