0
votes
1
reply
17
views
2
votes
9
replies
262
views
0
votes
1
reply
97
views
updated 11 hours ago by
Mensur Dlakic
★
29k
•
written 12 hours ago by
benjamin.kellman
•
0
0
votes
2
replies
139
views
839
votes
170
replies
179k
views
112 follow
updated 6 weeks ago by
Biostar
3.6k
•
written 8.5 years ago by
Istvan Albert
102k
0
votes
0
replies
78
views
19 hours ago by
Physalia-courses
★
2.6k
3
votes
0
replies
115
views
1 day ago by
Ming Tommy Tang
★
4.6k
0
votes
1
reply
136
views
2
votes
1
reply
388
views
2
votes
1
reply
173
views
updated 1 day ago by
GenoMax
151k
•
written 1 day ago by
rajdeepboral00
▴
70
1
vote
0
replies
121
views
2
votes
4
replies
308
views
updated 1 day ago by
colindaven
7.6k
•
written 1 day ago by
sarahmanderni
▴
130
6
votes
2
replies
1.4k
views
updated 1 day ago by
ashotmarg2004
▴
130
•
written 21 months ago by
a615ebfb
▴
50
0
votes
1
reply
159
views
0
votes
0
replies
119
views
0
votes
2
replies
227
views
0
votes
0
replies
134
views
0
votes
0
replies
139
views
0
votes
0
replies
148
views
2 days ago by
zsc25001
▴
10
1
vote
6
replies
320
views
0
votes
0
replies
155
views
2 days ago by
Titus
▴
910
4
votes
3
replies
312
views
0
votes
0
replies
140
views
1
vote
7
replies
395
views
updated 1 day ago by
GenoMax
151k
•
written 2 days ago by
SpliceAndScript
•
0
1
vote
1
reply
208
views
updated 2 days ago by
GenoMax
151k
•
written 2 days ago by
Arup Ghosh
3.3k
0
votes
2
replies
267
views
2 days ago by
Peter
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
179
views
2
votes
4
replies
347
views
0
votes
2
replies
260
views
1
vote
2
replies
280
views
4
votes
2
replies
269
views
0
votes
0
replies
192
views
0
votes
0
replies
169
views
0
votes
0
replies
170
views
3 days ago by
Begonia_pavonina
▴
210
6
votes
2
replies
273
views
3 days ago by
Mahdi&Christ
▴
20
4
votes
4
replies
393
views
9
votes
9
replies
573
views
0
votes
1
reply
255
views
0
votes
1
reply
774
views
2
votes
10
replies
556
views
updated 3 days ago by
GenoMax
151k
•
written 4 days ago by
anthony.santana.703.j
▴
30
0
votes
0
replies
207
views
4 days ago by
Claire Watson
▴
60
1
vote
6
replies
399
views
4
votes
0
replies
234
views
2
votes
0
replies
209
views
2
votes
0
replies
224
views
2
votes
0
replies
230
views
0
votes
2
replies
269
views
2
votes
7
replies
503
views
updated 4 days ago by
GenoMax
151k
•
written 5 days ago by
ramiro.barrantes
▴
60
1
vote
1
reply
249
views
Recent Locations •
All
Bologna, 6 minutes ago
USA, 12 minutes ago
United States, 13 minutes ago
Norway, 29 minutes ago
India, 1 hour ago
India, 1 hour ago
United States, 1 hour ago
Recent Awards •
All
Popular Question to
Physalia-courses
★
2.6k
Popular Question to
lessismore
★
1.4k
Supporter to
marco.barr
▴
170
Popular Question to
SomeOne
▴
200
Popular Question to
Gabriel R.
★
2.9k
Popular Question to
am29
▴
60
Popular Question to
gynecoloji
•
0
Recent Replies
Comment: Should I perform integration to correct batch effects?
by
han
•
0
Actually, I tried two methods—one with batch effect correction and one without—and the results were completely different.
In the UMAP witho…
Comment: Different comparisons in RNASeq Analysis
by
swbarnes2
15k
You cannot remove batch effects where they overlap perfectly with a biological condition of interest.
Comment: Different comparisons in RNASeq Analysis
by
swbarnes2
15k
That's not really the comparison OP was asking about, but I don't think they can meaningfully do the comparisons they wanted.
Comment: Different comparisons in RNASeq Analysis
by
swbarnes2
15k
You will get slightly different alignment with longer paired reads. You don't want that if you want to compare the two sets of reads to ea…
Comment: Distribution of assayed SNPs per sample
by
mbyvcm
▴
460
> According to my logic, one could do this by filtering out SNPs with missing genotype calls (./.), however when I did this, I ended up hav…
Answer: Different comparisons in RNASeq Analysis
by
mbyvcm
▴
460
For analysis 3, you could think about something like:
(Plant Mut vs. Plant WT) vs (Flask Mut vs. Flask WT)
In doing so you are internally…
Answer: Querying on non-canonical bacterial IDs
by
Mensur Dlakic
★
29k
I don't think there are any other records, including what you call canonical, for this protein.
Maybe this will help you, using [**Entrez …
Comment: Different comparisons in RNASeq Analysis
by
jkim
▴
190
See [the post](https://www.biostars.org/p/403053/#473727).
Comment: Different comparisons in RNASeq Analysis
by
SomeOne
▴
200
Hi. Thank you for replying.
If i trim the PE data to SE and at 75bp length, and perform the analysis.
Wouldn’t that effect the final co…
Comment: Different comparisons in RNASeq Analysis
by
SomeOne
▴
200
Hi! Thank you for your response.
Can you share some information on how to remove this batch effect ?
Answer: Different comparisons in RNASeq Analysis
by
swbarnes2
15k
> or the Different sequence-type (paired vs single), difference in
> read-length (150bp-x2 vs 75bp-x1) will have any technical or batch
…
Comment: Different comparisons in RNASeq Analysis
by
jkim
▴
190
For analyses 3 and 4, you will need to account for batch effects, which I expect to be substantial given the differences between datasets—e…
Comment: Distribution of assayed SNPs per sample
by
1769mkc
★
1.3k
if you can share some part of the data that would be helpful what you are trying and what the final output expected , that helps for people…
Comment: Trouble building combined pangenome graph with circularized genomes + embedded O
by
Jordan M Eizenga
▴
740
That error is caused by a simple failure to open that file (which is created in the `vg prune`). Usually, that results from a typo in the f…
Comment: SAIGE-GENE error
by
GenoMax
151k
Segfaults are related to memory, which is what part of the message is telling you. If you are running this job under a job scheduler make s…
Traffic: 2282 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6