2
votes
9
replies
231
views
0
votes
1
reply
84
views
updated 7 hours ago by
Mensur Dlakic
★
29k
•
written 8 hours ago by
benjamin.kellman
•
0
839
votes
170
replies
179k
views
112 follow
updated 6 weeks ago by
Biostar
3.6k
•
written 8.5 years ago by
Istvan Albert
102k
0
votes
2
replies
124
views
0
votes
0
replies
69
views
15 hours ago by
Physalia-courses
★
2.6k
3
votes
0
replies
105
views
1 day ago by
Ming Tommy Tang
★
4.6k
0
votes
1
reply
127
views
2
votes
1
reply
346
views
2
votes
1
reply
163
views
updated 1 day ago by
GenoMax
151k
•
written 1 day ago by
rajdeepboral00
▴
70
1
vote
0
replies
113
views
2
votes
4
replies
298
views
updated 1 day ago by
colindaven
7.6k
•
written 1 day ago by
sarahmanderni
▴
130
6
votes
2
replies
1.4k
views
updated 1 day ago by
ashotmarg2004
▴
130
•
written 21 months ago by
a615ebfb
▴
50
0
votes
1
reply
152
views
0
votes
0
replies
112
views
0
votes
2
replies
218
views
0
votes
0
replies
125
views
0
votes
0
replies
130
views
0
votes
0
replies
142
views
2 days ago by
zsc25001
▴
10
1
vote
6
replies
312
views
0
votes
0
replies
147
views
2 days ago by
Titus
▴
910
4
votes
3
replies
300
views
0
votes
0
replies
132
views
1
vote
7
replies
382
views
updated 1 day ago by
GenoMax
151k
•
written 2 days ago by
SpliceAndScript
•
0
1
vote
1
reply
200
views
updated 2 days ago by
GenoMax
151k
•
written 2 days ago by
Arup Ghosh
3.3k
0
votes
2
replies
259
views
2 days ago by
Peter
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
172
views
2
votes
4
replies
337
views
0
votes
2
replies
252
views
1
vote
2
replies
272
views
4
votes
2
replies
261
views
0
votes
0
replies
183
views
0
votes
0
replies
161
views
0
votes
0
replies
163
views
3 days ago by
Begonia_pavonina
▴
210
6
votes
2
replies
265
views
3 days ago by
Mahdi&Christ
▴
20
4
votes
4
replies
383
views
9
votes
9
replies
564
views
0
votes
1
reply
248
views
0
votes
1
reply
766
views
2
votes
10
replies
546
views
updated 3 days ago by
GenoMax
151k
•
written 4 days ago by
anthony.santana.703.j
▴
30
0
votes
0
replies
200
views
4 days ago by
Claire Watson
▴
60
1
vote
6
replies
388
views
4
votes
0
replies
226
views
2
votes
0
replies
202
views
2
votes
0
replies
217
views
2
votes
0
replies
222
views
0
votes
2
replies
262
views
2
votes
7
replies
493
views
updated 4 days ago by
GenoMax
151k
•
written 5 days ago by
ramiro.barrantes
▴
60
1
vote
1
reply
240
views
0
votes
1
reply
237
views
0
votes
1
reply
246
views
Recent Locations •
All
United States, 23 minutes ago
United States, 48 minutes ago
São Paulo, 1 hour ago
Chile, 1 hour ago
United States, 1 hour ago
United States, 1 hour ago
United States, 2 hours ago
Recent Awards •
All
Popular Question to
Physalia-courses
★
2.6k
Popular Question to
lessismore
★
1.4k
Supporter to
marco.barr
▴
170
Popular Question to
SomeOne
▴
200
Popular Question to
Gabriel R.
★
2.9k
Popular Question to
am29
▴
60
Popular Question to
gynecoloji
•
0
Recent Replies
Comment: Different comparisons in RNASeq Analysis
by
swbarnes2
15k
You cannot remove batch effects where they overlap perfectly with a biological condition of interest.
Comment: Different comparisons in RNASeq Analysis
by
swbarnes2
15k
That's not really the comparison OP was asking about, but I don't think they can meaningfully do the comparisons they wanted.
Comment: Different comparisons in RNASeq Analysis
by
swbarnes2
15k
You will get slightly different alignment with longer paired reads. You don't want that if you want to compare the two sets of reads to ea…
Comment: Distribution of assayed SNPs per sample
by
mbyvcm
▴
460
> According to my logic, one could do this by filtering out SNPs with missing genotype calls (./.), however when I did this, I ended up hav…
Answer: Different comparisons in RNASeq Analysis
by
mbyvcm
▴
460
For analysis 3, you could think about something like:
(Plant Mut vs. Plant WT) vs (Flask Mut vs. Flask WT)
In doing so you are internally…
Answer: Querying on non-canonical bacterial IDs
by
Mensur Dlakic
★
29k
I don't think there are any other records, including what you call canonical, for this protein.
Maybe this will help you, using [**Entrez …
Comment: Different comparisons in RNASeq Analysis
by
jkim
▴
190
See [the post](https://www.biostars.org/p/403053/#473727).
Comment: Different comparisons in RNASeq Analysis
by
SomeOne
▴
200
Hi. Thank you for replying.
If i trim the PE data to SE and at 75bp length, and perform the analysis.
Wouldn’t that effect the final co…
Comment: Different comparisons in RNASeq Analysis
by
SomeOne
▴
200
Hi! Thank you for your response.
Can you share some information on how to remove this batch effect ?
Answer: Different comparisons in RNASeq Analysis
by
swbarnes2
15k
> or the Different sequence-type (paired vs single), difference in
> read-length (150bp-x2 vs 75bp-x1) will have any technical or batch
…
Comment: Different comparisons in RNASeq Analysis
by
jkim
▴
190
For analyses 3 and 4, you will need to account for batch effects, which I expect to be substantial given the differences between datasets—e…
Comment: Distribution of assayed SNPs per sample
by
1769mkc
★
1.3k
if you can share some part of the data that would be helpful what you are trying and what the final output expected , that helps for people…
Comment: Trouble building combined pangenome graph with circularized genomes + embedded O
by
Jordan M Eizenga
▴
740
That error is caused by a simple failure to open that file (which is created in the `vg prune`). Usually, that results from a typo in the f…
Comment: SAIGE-GENE error
by
GenoMax
151k
Segfaults are related to memory, which is what part of the message is telling you. If you are running this job under a job scheduler make s…
Answer: IGV track display problem: interval rectangle from BED file appears above all tr
by
mcsimenc
▴
30
The problem was the filename suffix, it's meaningful in how IGV treats the file. It is .pk here, but changed to .bed and it works.
Traffic: 2274 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6