5
votes
7
replies
3.3k
views
5
votes
1
reply
581
views
5
votes
6
replies
1.0k
views
5
votes
4
replies
1.0k
views
11 months ago by
firestar
★
1.6k
5
votes
11
replies
3.4k
views
5
votes
2
replies
716
views
5
votes
7
replies
631
views
5
votes
8
replies
1.7k
views
updated 6 weeks ago by
Jingjingzhang
•
0
•
written 3.3 years ago by
from the mountains
▴
230
5
votes
10
replies
939
views
5
votes
5
replies
1.7k
views
5
votes
8
replies
834
views
5
votes
4
replies
453
views
5
votes
12
replies
996
views
5
votes
2
replies
525
views
updated 10 months ago by
shenwei356
8.3k
•
written 10 months ago by
GR
▴
400
5
votes
7
replies
813
views
updated 6 months ago by
supernovamik
•
0
•
written 3.9 years ago by
ee.mohseni.alert
▴
50
5
votes
3
replies
369
views
updated 11 weeks ago by
Ram
41k
•
written 11 weeks ago by
sarahmanderni
▴
100
5
votes
3
replies
700
views
8 months ago by
Confused_human
▴
10
5
votes
7
replies
703
views
5
votes
5
replies
2.2k
views
5
votes
4
replies
1.8k
views
updated 8 months ago by
Ram
41k
•
written 7.5 years ago by
Nolwenn Lavielle
▴
90
5
votes
6
replies
1.4k
views
5
votes
1
reply
499
views
updated 6 weeks ago by
Jordan M Eizenga
▴
410
•
written 6 weeks ago by
Kyran
▴
30
5
votes
8
replies
1.9k
views
updated 4 months ago by
Jordan M Eizenga
▴
410
•
written 10 months ago by
TN
•
0
5
votes
6
replies
1.3k
views
updated 5 months ago by
Ram
41k
•
written 3.6 years ago by
Ranan Jyoti Sarma
▴
90
5
votes
6
replies
1.9k
views
updated 11 months ago by
Ram
41k
•
written 8.5 years ago by
marcoabbestia
•
0
5
votes
35
replies
3.0k
views
updated 4 months ago by
Jordan M Eizenga
▴
410
•
written 5 months ago by
anivlete
•
0
5
votes
8
replies
1.3k
views
5
votes
2
replies
3.1k
views
updated 10 months ago by
baijiangshan9726
•
0
•
written 3.1 years ago by
blur
▴
280
5
votes
3
replies
327
views
5
votes
6
replies
3.2k
views
updated 11 months ago by
Ram
41k
•
written 8.4 years ago by
komal.rathi
★
4.1k
5
votes
2
replies
246
views
6 days ago by
Rafael Soler
★
1.2k
5
votes
4
replies
941
views
5
votes
14
replies
3.6k
views
updated 10 months ago by
Jeremy Leipzig
22k
•
written 10 months ago by
Emoji
•
0
5
votes
1
reply
399
views
updated 3 months ago by
bk11
★
1.8k
•
written 3 months ago by
Manuel Sokolov Ravasqueira
▴
100
5
votes
7
replies
1.2k
views
5
votes
10
replies
687
views
4
votes
4
replies
502
views
3 months ago by
nshenoy
▴
50
4
votes
7
replies
771
views
4
votes
5
replies
700
views
updated 3 months ago by
Louisse_Ensembl
▴
60
•
written 3 months ago by
Jeremy Leipzig
22k
4
votes
45
replies
7.0k
views
updated 7 months ago by
Ram
41k
•
written 7.4 years ago by
cristina_sabiers
▴
110
4
votes
2
replies
2.3k
views
updated 10 months ago by
Ram
41k
•
written 8.5 years ago by
Jeroen Van Goey
2.3k
4
votes
4
replies
2.7k
views
4
votes
3
replies
706
views
4
votes
7
replies
2.5k
views
4
votes
5
replies
1.3k
views
4
votes
9
replies
974
views
4
votes
7
replies
2.7k
views
updated 8 months ago by
Ram
41k
•
written 2.4 years ago by
mathavanbioinfo
▴
70
4
votes
3
replies
381
views
4
votes
12
replies
1.5k
views
updated 11 months ago by
Ram
41k
•
written 18 months ago by
nils.simon.biology
▴
10
4
votes
1
reply
3.0k
views
Recent Votes
Recent Locations •
All
Spain, just now
Russia, 2 minutes ago
Denmark, 2 minutes ago
Hong Kong, 2 minutes ago
Poland, 5 minutes ago
Brazil, 5 minutes ago
Germany, 10 minutes ago
Recent Awards •
All
Commentator to
Devon Ryan
104k
Popular Question to
gernophil
▴
40
Teacher to
chrchang523
10k
Commentator to
ATpoint
78k
Popular Question to
Peerzada
•
0
Popular Question to
luffy
▴
110
Recent Replies
Comment: Problematic fastq files...How can we trust them?
by
blackadder
▴
30
Its not my data. An external researcher is visiting and she wanted from us to do some bioinformatics... The samples were not sequenced by u…
Comment: Tools or R / Python packages to perfom ML models
by
sil_bioinfo
▴
30
Oh, I understand. Thank you so much for your help!
The truth is that there is so much information, so many packages, libraries, tutorials,…
Comment: Tools or R / Python packages to perfom ML models
by
Matthias Zepper
4.2k
Just to clarify:
Many ML models are trained and executed using dedicated software libraries for machine learning and artificial intellige…
Answer: Problematic fastq files...How can we trust them?
by
ATpoint
78k
> I assume that maybe all these are fixable with a script but my question is, can we trust these files? Is it worth spending time and effor…
Comment: Tools or R / Python packages to perfom ML models
by
sil_bioinfo
▴
30
My main idea is to be able to classify patients with active TB, LTBI and healthy patients as well as possible. The problem is that within t…
Comment: scRNA-seq: Consistent low number of cells and low fraction reads across the samp
by
rpolicastro
12k
They could have saved themselves a ton of money by sequencing this on a miseq.
Comment: Annotate Unplaced Scaffold with Chromosome Information
by
cmdcolin
★
3.4k
I think there are tools like ragtag https://github.com/malonge/RagTag that could help. you can also align your reads back to your new assem…
Comment: An incomprehensible error with R package gggenes
by
ATpoint
78k
It's not stupid, just a bit lazy ;-)
Comment: Adding functional annotation and meta-data of MAKER/BRAKER GFF
by
ben@f
•
0
Hi, did you find an effective solution for this problem? beside Agat and
Comment: An incomprehensible error with R package gggenes
by
alice005201314
•
0
Thank you. I asked a stupid question.
Answer: An incomprehensible error with R package gggenes
by
ATpoint
78k
First hit on google: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73935357/error-in-grid-callc-convert-x-as-integerwhatfrom-as-integerwhatto-vie
Answer: Should I scale all genes in single cell Seurat?
by
antonioggsousa
3.0k
Hi,
Scaling all features might be useful to plot genes that are not among the 2k HVG in a heatmap. Otherwise than that, I never encounter…
Comment: How to filter .fasta file based on conditional statement
by
rob_DNA
▴
20
Oh wow that was a bit stupid.. I downloaded 39.06 but I accidentally used 39.01... anyway, thank you very much for your help!! I now used t…
Comment: scRNA-seq: Consistent low number of cells and low fraction reads across the samp
by
GenoMax
136k
> less than 100 for some samples
Hmm. That is surprising but then in light of that fact ~20% recovery of cells does not sound bad.
Traffic: 2579 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6