4.4 years ago by
fafad046
•
0
1
vote
2
replies
1.3k
views
0
votes
0
replies
843
views
0
votes
0
replies
705
views
0
votes
1
reply
2.6k
views
2
votes
4
replies
1.6k
views
updated 4.4 years ago by
jared.andrews07
★
19k
•
written 4.4 years ago by
shrinka.genetics
▴
40
47
votes
21
replies
30k
views
14 follow
2
votes
1
reply
2.4k
views
updated 4.4 years ago by
Mensur Dlakic
★
30k
•
written 4.4 years ago by
ranjuks641
▴
10
0
votes
2
replies
1.4k
views
1
vote
8
replies
3.7k
views
updated 4.4 years ago by
cpad0112
21k
•
written 4.4 years ago by
evafinegan
•
0
0
votes
1
reply
1.1k
views
updated 4.4 years ago by
ATpoint
89k
•
written 4.4 years ago by
halffedelf
▴
40
1
vote
3
replies
1.6k
views
2
votes
5
replies
3.0k
views
1
vote
2
replies
1.0k
views
2
votes
3
replies
1.6k
views
4.4 years ago by
pm2012
▴
140
0
votes
3
replies
1.9k
views
1
vote
1
reply
1.2k
views
updated 4.4 years ago by
alicetondre
•
0
•
written 5.8 years ago by
annaschumannuni
▴
10
1
vote
5
replies
2.1k
views
updated 4.4 years ago by
German.M.Demidov
★
3.0k
•
written 4.4 years ago by
Filago
▴
110
5
votes
4
replies
3.2k
views
4.4 years ago by
courtney.e.hershberger
▴
10
2
votes
4
replies
1.6k
views
4.4 years ago by
Alexandros.Frydas
▴
30
1
vote
1
reply
1.0k
views
1
vote
1
reply
3.8k
views
updated 4.4 years ago by
jared.andrews07
★
19k
•
written 4.4 years ago by
mvis1231
▴
140
0
votes
0
replies
729
views
4.4 years ago by
Physalia-courses
★
2.6k
0
votes
0
replies
493
views
8
votes
4
replies
2.5k
views
2
votes
3
replies
1.4k
views
3
votes
1
reply
1.3k
views
5
votes
3
replies
2.4k
views
updated 4.4 years ago by
ATpoint
89k
•
written 4.4 years ago by
bioinfo456
▴
150
0
votes
0
replies
912
views
0
votes
1
reply
837
views
2
votes
3
replies
9.8k
views
0
votes
3
replies
2.5k
views
0
votes
1
reply
954
views
2
votes
3
replies
1.8k
views
1
vote
3
replies
2.3k
views
updated 4.4 years ago by
Pierre Lindenbaum
166k
•
written 4.4 years ago by
Alexandros.Frydas
▴
30
2
votes
2
replies
1.9k
views
0
votes
1
reply
1.1k
views
4.4 years ago by
mail2steff
▴
70
4
votes
10
replies
7.3k
views
0
votes
0
replies
610
views
1
vote
0
replies
994
views
0
votes
2
replies
1.6k
views
updated 4.4 years ago by
Jorge Amigo
14k
•
written 4.4 years ago by
brighteyes1017
•
0
2
votes
4
replies
1.8k
views
0
votes
0
replies
557
views
1
vote
1
reply
820
views
3
votes
6
replies
5.0k
views
1
vote
1
reply
1.4k
views
updated 4.4 years ago by
Jean-Karim Heriche
27k
•
written 4.4 years ago by
Arindam Ghosh
▴
550
0
votes
0
replies
855
views
4.4 years ago by
seok1213neo
▴
40
0
votes
1
reply
1.0k
views
3
votes
1
reply
1.9k
views
1
vote
3
replies
1.2k
views
0
votes
0
replies
673
views
Recent Votes
Recent Locations •
All
Finland, just now
United Kingdom, 9 minutes ago
Munich, 11 minutes ago
Bologna, 13 minutes ago
France, 16 minutes ago
Portugal, 16 minutes ago
Machhagan, 18 minutes ago
Recent Awards •
All
Teacher to
lieven.sterck
16k
Popular Question to
carolofharvest
▴
50
Popular Question to
Physalia-courses
★
2.6k
Popular Question to
crop
•
0
Popular Question to
yarrowmadrona
▴
10
Popular Question to
Ram
45k
Recent Replies
Comment: DESeq2 on metagenome KO counts
by
young_bioinformatician
▴
240
Thank you but sorry, your answer sounds very AI-based...
Answer: How to handle TrEMBL proteins without gene annotation in plasma proteomics?
by
Aleksandra
▴
160
For basic analysis, discard anything that isn't from Swiss-Prot. Your statistics and pathway analysis should only be based on reliable, ann…
Answer: Recommendations for 200 SNP markers genotyping
by
Aleksandra
▴
160
For a 200-SNP panel at your sample throughput, I would recommend an amplicon-based targeted sequencing approach.
The workflow involves des…
Comment: Reasonable number of SNPs in a bacterial genome.
by
dthorbur
★
3.1k
There are *a lot* of factors that can impact the number of identified SNPs. These include things like:
- Evolutionary distance from samp…
Answer: DESeq2 on metagenome KO counts
by
Aleksandra
▴
160
Your proposed workflow is indeed sound, as applying DESeq2 to KO-counts is perfectly valid; its underlying negative binomial model is metho…
Comment: Interpreting genomic features distribution for CUT&RUN peaks
by
Rozita
▴
40
The massive difference has been reproducible across the 3 biological replicates and is in line with what we would expect in terms of the bi…
Answer: Interpreting genomic features distribution for CUT&RUN peaks
by
LChart
5.1k
My initial concern is the ~15-fold difference (450 vs 7500) between called peaks in the two different cell line conditions. This suggests t…
Comment: Recommendations for 200 SNP markers genotyping
by
Michael
56k
Which organism are you talking about, and are these markers fixed? You can search for existing genotyping options using this information. F…
Comment: Tools to simulate Illumina short read sequences and ONT long reads with a refere
by
PolenP
•
0
I tried Insilico seq as per your suggestion and it is really good. Unfortunately, it's taking more than 3 days to simulate 5x coverage of a…
Comment: hisat2 error-Paired end reads not equal or lack of RAM/disk space?
by
lieven.sterck
16k
How did you get to these un-synced files? aka, what was your previous step in this analysis?
I'm asking, as usually you need to make sure …
Comment: Problems with PacBio's Improved Phased Assembler (IPA)
by
Panos
★
1.8k
Just so others know (in case they try) downgrading snakemake/python didn't work for me. In fact, I tried a number of different combinations…
Comment: headers missing in efetch results for SRA database
by
Leela
•
0
Please note that this is still a problem in the recent version in `conda` (v24.0)
Comment: Problems with PacBio's Improved Phased Assembler (IPA)
by
Billy Rowell
▴
520
Completely understand. I hope this helps then!
Comment: Active site using castpfold
by
Mensur Dlakic
★
30k
Please don't take my comment the wrong way.
Docking ligands is a serious endeavor that includes many preparatory steps, a use of highly so…
Traffic: 7676 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6